Cross-referencing

Cross-referencing is done terribly.

YAML 問題

All the academic cross-referencing formats are pretty awful. None of them are particularly powerful and there's so many opinions about the correct way to do it, they become worthless.


沒有子分類。


投票 (可選) (別通知) (可選)
請,登錄

我在想-HTML中的“ A”標記用於引用-但大多數情況下,除了鏈接標題外,我們不包含適當的語義關係(但如果可以的話,我們可以使用的語義鏈接)。例如,Wikidata P是此類鏈接類型的列表(它們稱爲屬性)...

但是,URL本身就是用於引用的,所以爲什麼URL不應該包含語義鏈接數據。

然後,如果要引用純文本(而不是超文本)的內容,則URL通常很長。

這些無疑是交叉引用中的挑戰。

I'm thinking -- the "A" tag in HTML was meant for referencing -- but most of the time, we do not include a proper semantic relationship, other than link title (but we could, if we had a list of commonly used semantic links). For example, Wikidata P is a list of such link types (they call them properties)...

But then, URL itself as such was meant for referencing, so why shouldn't a URL include semantic link data.

And then, usually URLs are long, if you want to reference things in plain text (rather than hypertext).

These are certainly challenges in cross-referencing.


語言