Self-Organised Learning Communities

What's the optimum size for a learning group?

YAML 問題

Learning in a group has benefits (speed up understanding, see new perspectives, solve problems faster, boost motivation). But what's the best size for learning groups?

Background info: Inspired by educator Sugata Mitra project "Hole in the Wall", I question how learning could spread outside education institutions and more as culture in our world. Also when reading B.Fuller's ideas on synergetics and systems (book "A Fuller Explanation"), I got to know about a min.system pattern found in nature called tetrahedron.

Here, I wonder, if a min. size of a learning group is 4? And is it the best size?

I'm curiois because I'd love to facilitate multiple learning groups!


沒有子分類。

投票 (可選) (別通知) (可選)
請,登錄

我也受到 Sugata Mitra 對自組織的探索的啓發。 Jeremy Lent 的著作《意義之網》探討了自組織的概念,因爲它適用於自然模式和人類活動。

“儘管這些模式在自然界中非常壯觀,但它們所代表的原則也適用於人類活動。無論我們是在研究胚胎如何發育、進化如何發生、生態系統的動態、城市如何運作、市場如何波動,甚至文明如何興衰,許多原則保持不變。當我們意識到這些自組織模式適用的廣闊領域時,我們開始理解理解它們是多麼重要。”

借了,傑里米。意義之網(第 102-103 頁)。新社會出版社。 Kindle版。

I was also inspired by Sugata Mitra’s explorations of self-organization. Jeremy Lent’s book, The Web of Meaning, explores the concept of self-organization as it applies to patterns of nature and to human activity.

“Spectacular as these patterns are in nature, the principles they represent also apply to human activity. Whether we’re looking at how an embryo develops, how evolution occurs, the dynamics of an ecosystem, how cities operate, how markets fluctuate, and even how civilizations rise and fall, many principles remain the same. When we realize the vast terrain over which these patterns of self-organization apply, we begin to comprehend how crucial it is to understand them.”

Lent, Jeremy. The Web of Meaning (pp. 102-103). New Society Publishers. Kindle Edition.



    : Ruta
    : Mindey
    :  -- 
    

bauhouse,
[+]

喜歡那個 [bauhouse],感謝您一起探索!

從您的引述來看,我們似乎同意關於系統如何運作的自組織。

但是系統的誕生呢?自組織系統是如何誕生的?如果我們尋求一個自組織的學習社區,那麼探索系統的起源很有趣。或者開始只是純粹的隨機性?

Love that [bauhouse], thanks for exploring together!

From your quote it seems that we agree about self-organisation on how systems function.

But how about the birth of systems? How do self-organised systems birth? If we seek a self-organised learning community, then the beginnings of systems are interesting to explore. Or are beginnings just pure randomness?


不,不是隨機的。每個開始都是對其他過程的迭代。請記住,它都是分形的。開始只是一個分叉,可能結果的實例化。

No,not random. each beginning is iteration on other process. Remember, its all fractal. Beginning is just a fork, instantiation of possible outcome.


我對那個主題很感興趣。我將學習和教學視爲任何組織結構的有機組成部分。保持結構的自由度至關重要,因此人們可以在其中自由移動。我把位置想象成節點,人們喜歡自由粒子,成羣結隊地粘在這些節點上。因此,一個由一組合作者佔據的經理職位,使用我們提供的教學工具,而不是社區提供的教學工具,相互教學和指導。儘管如此,我們必須實踐它,創造種子工具,在solarea中交易它們,讓社區接管並發展它。那將是我們的教育行業。分佈式和有機,一種自己的經濟,主要使用現有的教育者和工具,但在不同的自由結構中。這適用於任何行業。這是一種解決方案。

Im very interested in that subject. I see learning and teaching as an organic part of any organizational structure. Its essential to maintain degrees of freedom in the structure, so people can freely move within it. I envision positions as nodes, and people like free particles, sticking around in clumps to those nodes. So a manager position occupied by a team of collaborators, teaching and mentoring each other, using the instructional tools we provide, rather community provides. Still, we have to practice it, create the seed tools, trade them in solarea, and let community take over and evolve it. That will be our educational industry. Distributed and organic, an economy of iys own, prbly using the existing educators and tools, but in a different structure of freedom. That applies to any industry. This is a type, of solution.


宇宙似乎只是從時間的距離上重生。觀察大流行,我意識到,每一次大爆炸都是一個相變。像水沸騰。首先,幾個泡沫開始合併,通貨膨脹階段開始,合併迅速,將舊結構爆炸性地轉變爲新結構。它是一種結構變換。它可以建模爲一個函數,一個儀表。我在我的邏輯引擎中構建這些功能。所以,每一個開始,如果成功,都會接管思想,傳播,併成爲一場運動。而且,如果你想成功,就順其自然。最好的辦法是對任何想法都賦予很高的道德價值,然後隨它去。我稱之爲社交黑客。說真的,我看到社區如何自我指導,以優化自由和善良。這些可以通過儀表測量並通過社區儀表板上的刻度盤進行調整,在社區同行評審下,並編入區塊鏈 nft。這就是我所看到的 solarea 提供的。

Universes only seem to be born anew, from the distance of time. Observing the pandemic, i realized, every big bang is a phase transition. Like water boiling. First, a few bubbles, they start merging, and inflationary phase begins, when mergers quickly, explosively transform the old structure into new one. Its a structure transform. It can be modelled as a function, a gauge. Im building these functions in my logic engine. So, every beginning, if successful, takes over the minds, spreads, and becomes a movement. And, if you wanna succeed, go with that flow. Best is to attach a high moral value to any idea, and let it go. I call it social hacking . Seriously, i see how communities can self guide themselves, to optimize freedom and kindness. These can be measured by gauges and adjusted by dials on community dashboard, under community peer review, and codified into a blockchain nft. Thats what i see solarea to provide.


不要誤解社交黑客。它只是意味着幫助社區保持正軌。並且,您不會爲想法賦予道德價值,而是爲您的想法找到比您更有益於他人的方法。你的業力會照顧你。考慮社區優先的方法。

Dont misunderstand social hacking. It simply means helping communities to stay on track. And, you dont attach moral value to ideas, but find a way for your idea to benefit others even more then you. Your karma will take care of you. Think community first approach.


語言