Thinking Culture

How to move from no-thinking to insight?

YAML 問題

Creativity welcomes everyone who has a need to express themselves. But creativity starts with thinking. And thinking is not part of a modern culture (consumerism is).

Here I wonder, what's the best way to learn thinking for someone who has never done it? And how does tetrahedron example apply for facilitation of thinking for someone?


沒有子分類。




投票 (可選) (別通知) (可選)
請,登錄

富勒(B.Fuller)將生活定義爲“思想”,而4是具有思想的最小值。但是,這實際上意味着什麼呢?

參考:

http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s05/p1000.html

B.Fuller defines life as "thoughts" and 4 being a min.number for having a thought. But what does it mean in practise?

Reference: http://www.rwgrayprojects.com/synergetics/s05/p1000.html


“更全面的解釋”讀書俱樂部的註釋:

“思維隔離事件;“理解”然後將它們互連。“理解是結構”。

“意識到一個思想至少需要足夠的“東西”來定義一個孤立的系統,因此知道最小數目似乎至關重要。”

“一個“思想”是一個“相關的集合”:經驗以某種方式彼此相關。所有其餘的經驗都在集合之外,而沒有調入。”

-聽起來像是一種創造力/觀念的結構!可以轉化爲“學習如何思考”指南

Notes from "A Fuller Explanation" book club:

"Thinking isolates events; "understanding" then interconnects them. "Understanding is structure,"

"Realizing that a thought required at least enough "somethings" to define an isolated system, it seemed vitally important to know the minimum number ..."

"A "thought" is a "relevant set": experiences related to each other in some way. All the rest of experience is outside the set-not tuned in."

-- sounds like a structure of creativity/ideation! which could be transformed into "learning how to think" guidance"


//思維不是現代文化的一部分(消費主義是)。

這確實是有見地的。在當前系統下發生的事情是AI直接連接到[limbic系統](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limbic_system),而不是[neocortex](https://en.wikipedia.org / wiki / Neocortex)。之所以發生這種情況,是因爲營銷人員發現,潛意識和潛意識的信息傳遞效果更好,並且濫用了人們的大腦回路(limbic系統),通過與那些更基本的需求相關的貨幣系統來控制人口,並將整個互聯網推向了這一方向。 “圖像優先”而不是“表格優先”。

我認爲,這可能是由於缺乏大數據去中心化思考的工具,而新的思想可能會改變現狀。

// And thinking is not part of a modern culture (consumerism is).

This is insightful, and indeed. What is happening under the current system, is AI getting directly connected to the limbic system, not the neocortex. This seem to have happened due to marketers finding out that subliminal and subconscious messaging works better, and abusing people's brain circuitry (limbic system), to control the populations with monetary system connected to those more basic needs, and pushing the whole internet to that direction of "images-first" instead of "tables first."

It may be because of the lack of tools for big-data decentralized thinking, and new ideas for that may change the status quo, I believe.


我曾經以爲我很直覺,所以沒有想到。所以我不認爲事情會積極進行。我沒有內部獨白。我只是做。

我對事物非常深刻地思考,但這都是無形的思想,而且是表面之下的。

它是口頭的。

I used to think I didn't think, as I was intuitive. So I don't think things through actively. I don't have an internal monologue. I just do.

I think pretty deeply about things, but it's all invisible thoughts and below the surface.

It's pre-verbal.


爲了闡明我爲什麼要分享這個問題,我將進一步問“創造力是如何發生的?”。對我來說,這是關於收集草稿(靈感和觀察),然後,當我的思維散焦時,突然之間思想聯繫起來,洞察力誕生了!

總體而言,對我而言,(創造性)思維就像將思維建構爲難題一樣,是由別人的思想以及我的經歷引發的。

(有關“精神分散和專注”的相關資源,以及兩種情況下大腦中發生的事情都是“學習方法”課程-參見鏈接)

我提到B.Fuller的“有思想的系統”思想是有目的的,因爲我想知道在收集觀察結果並將其綜合爲見解的過程中是否存在一些指導數字。

反思思想是如何發生的,尤其是有價值的思想,這是很有用的,因爲如果可以改變教育,那麼它就可以轉變爲教人們如何更好地思考。

to clarify why I share this question, I would further ask "how does creativity occur?". to me, it's about collecting drafts (inspirations and observations) and then, suddenly when my mind is defocused, thoughts connect and an insight is born!

overall, to me, (creative) thinking is like constructing thoughts as puzzles which are sparked by someone else's thoughts and also my experiences.

(related resource on "mind defocused and focused" and what happens in the brain in both cases is Learning How to Learn course - see links)

I mention B.Fuller's thinking on "thoughts being a system" on purpose, because I wonder if there's some guiding number in the process of collecting observations and then synthesising them into an insight.

it's useful to reflect on how thoughts occur, and especially valuable thoughts, because if education can be transformed, so it can be transformed into a teaching people how to think better.


語言