Raising awareness of Infinity family

How do we bring people toward Infinity family?

YAML 問題

We need members to use Infinity family to create a buzzing marketplace.


沒有子分類。

投票 (可選) (別通知) (可選)
請,登錄

也許通過使其成爲一個協作數據項目?我注意到許多注重影響力的組織傾向於使用電子表格來組織他們的數據和層次結構,這主要是谷歌表格或 Airtable。我已經將 Infinity 的數據與 Google Sheets 和 Airtable 進行了同步。但是,我在設置消息代理之前暫停了同步,以避免它們減慢站點的運行速度。此外,我認爲,最好使用開源 BaseRow 來代替 Google Sheets 和 Airtable 進行數據協作。我認爲,將 Infinity 打造成一個協作數據項目對於將更多精通技術的人和組織聚集到 Infinity Family 中非常有用。讓用戶能夠將數據源(如爬網和 API 集成)連接到這個共享的項目數據池以進行推理,這是 Infinity 達到相關性所需的東西,就像 Wikipedia 所做的那樣。我認爲 Infinity 有“維基百科”之類的。

// 熱鬧的市場。

在對新人的價值主張中,可能有一羣常客(如發明評估員),他們對新問題、新想法提出建設性的批評。我認爲,這可以開始使用專門的 Telegram 渠道來實現,並帶來利益相關方:我們應該邀請專利局的員工嗎? :)

Perhaps by making it a collaborative data project? I've noticed that many impact-focused organizations tend to use spreadsheets to organize their data and hierarchies, which is -- mostly Google Sheets, or Airtable. I had made synchronization of data of Infinity with Google Sheets and Airtable. However, I have paused the synchronization after until I set up message-broker to avoid them slowing down the site's operation. Additionally, I think, instead of Google Sheets and Airtable, it would be good to use open source BaseRow for collaboration on data. I think, making Infinity into a collaborative data project is essential for making it useful for bringing more tech-savvy people and organizations together to the Infinity Family. Accomodating users with the ability to connect data sources (like crawls and API integrations) to this shared data pool of items to reason with, are among the things needed for Infinity to reach relevance, like Wikipedia had. I think of Infinity has "Wikipedia for Doing" of sorts.

// buzzing marketplace.

Among the value propositions to newcomers may be, that there's a bunch of regulars (like invention evaluators), who give constructive critique to new questions, ideas. I think, that can begin to realized using dedicated Telegram channels, and bringing the interested parties: should we invite employees of patent offices? :)


好電話[按時間順序]!對我來說,Infinity 似乎是爲那些喜歡在一天中花費數小時來思考、閱讀、評論和寫作的特定類型的人準備的。例如:

非線性思考者:喜歡思考多種興趣、探索各種主題、閱讀書籍、添加書籤、收集筆記和寫下想法的人,如研究人員、博主、記者。

好奇的評論員:喜歡閱讀各種主題並分享評論和見解的人,如博客評論員、LinkedIn 評論員、Reddit 評論員等。

熱愛會計的實幹家:喜歡記錄自己的創造性努力的人,也許是對生活記錄、量化自我、開放項目管理感興趣的人,也許是使用維基百科的人、圖書館員、項目和產品經理等。

我這麼說是因爲我邀請了一些朋友加入 Infinity Family 但他們不使用它 :) 所以我意識到他們可能沒有這樣的愛好來花幾個小時思考和組織思考。

然後根據我的設計工作,我意識到每項技術都是爲喜歡特定行爲的特定類型的人而設計的,而在 Infinity Family 的案例中,這種行爲似乎首先是思考和寫作。

那麼,我們首先在哪裏找到這些思想家?讓我們探索和邀請;)

Good call [chronological]! To me it seems that Infinity is for a certain type of people who love spending hours of their day simply to think, read, comment, write. For example:

Non-Linear Thinkers: People who enjoy thinking about multiple interests, exploring various topics, reading books, bookmarking, collecting notes and writing thoughts down like researchers, bloggers, journalists.

Curious Commentators: People who enjoy reading about various topics and sharing comments and insights, like blog commentators, LinkedIn commentators, Reddit commentators, etc.

Accounting-Loving Doers: People who love documenting their creative efforts, perhaps people interested in lifelogging, quantified self, open project management, perhaps people who use Wikipedia, librariars, project and product managers, etc.

I'm saying this because I invited some friends to Infinity Family but they don't use it :) So I realise they probably don't have such a hobby to spend hours thinking and organising thinking.

Then based on my design work I realised that every technology is for a certain type of people who enjoy certain behaviours, and in Infinity Family case this behaviour seems to be thinking and writing first.

So, where do we find those thinkers first? Let's explore and invite ;)


我當時在想,對我來說,Infinity 系列的功能即使在 MVP 階段之後也是完整的,因爲它是用來開發自己的。

我們需要大學項目、社區和社會企業以及初創公司使用 Infinity 系列來跟蹤其地理區域和黑客空間的事物。

我認爲 /r/side 項目和 Product Hunt 上的 Reddit 帖子,Kickstarter 應該是啓動 Infinity 系列的地方。

但所有這些都需要大量的努力來創建原始提案。 Product Hunt 需要一個高質量的信息頁面來記錄產品。 Kickstarter 需要管理任務。

I was thinking that to me Infinity family is feature complete even past the MVP stage as it is used to develop itself.

We need University projects and community and social enterprises and startups using Infinity family to track things for their geographic region and hackerspaces.

I think a Reddit post on /r/side projects and Product Hunt, Kickstarter should be places to launch Infinity family.

But all these requires a lot of effort to create the original proposal. Product Hunt expects a high quality information page documenting the product. Kickstarter requires administration tasks.


我完全同意你的觀點,魯塔。

我喜歡談論想法和想法,直到我感到舒服並且對這個想法有足夠的信心去努力。

我相信事物的社會創造是未來。如果有足夠多的人使用 Infinity 系列,未來可能會如此驚人。

由於健康問題,此時我可能比其他組更適合您類型學的“好奇評論員”組。但我確信如果出現正確的想法,我將能夠添加到項目中或啓動項目。我覺得我還沒有深入討論事情將如何或應該如何運作的主題,我渴望聽到其他人的想法和感受

I completely agree with you Ruta.

I enjoy talking of ideas and thoughts until I get comfortable and have faith in the idea enough to work on it.

I believe social creation of things is the future. The future could be so amazing with enough people using Infinity family.

I might fit more into the "Curious Commentators" group of your typology more than the other groups at this time due to health problems. But I am sure if the right idea came along I would be capable of adding to the project or starting the project. I feel I hast yet to enter in an in depth talk on a subject how things would or should work and I am eager to hear other people's thoughts and feelings


我可以看到 Infinity 家庭協作數據平臺的價值。我自己想要 P2P 數據存儲 API 或平臺。如果上帝願意,我會花一些時間來解決這個問題。

我有點把半面包店看作是一個討論不完全嚴肅的想法的平臺。但是那裏有很好的想法。但是對於如何進一步推進想法並繼續談論這些想法,並沒有真正的一致意見。

委員會對想法很危險,因爲它們會削弱任何一個成員的影響力,並試圖同時解決許多個人的品味和偏好。但是這些委員會、工作組和 RFC 的成果是互聯網標準和各種互聯網協議。而其他 API 協議平臺則是一個人的努力,例如 Bit Torrent 和比特幣。

I can see the value in collaborative data platform for Infinity family. I myself want P2P data storage APIs or platforms. If God wills it I wilt spend some time working on this problem.

I kind of see half bakery as a talking platform for ideas that aren't completely serious. But there are good ideas on there. But there's no real agreement on how to take ideas further and keep the talking of the ideas going.

Committees are dangerous to ideas as they cause dilution of any one member's influence and try to solve many individuals tastes and preferences at once. But the outcome of these committees and working groups and RFCs is the Internet Standards and various internet protocols. Whereas other APIs protocols platforms are one man efforts such as Bit Torrent and Bitcoin.



    : Mindey
    :  -- 
    :  -- 
    

chronological,

我覺得核心圈內的振動旋轉得越多,所產生的能量和共振就會把志同道合或“眼光一致”的人拉進來……

我的2美分...

那是一個論壇...

作爲一個市場……我希望回來寫點子……因爲我喜歡市場思想……交換、交易、價值創造、價值分享……可持續性、“成長”作爲動詞……

I feel the more vibrations spin within the core circle, the energies and resonance created will pull like-minded or "like-eyed" peops in...

my 2 cents...

thats as a forum...

As a marketplace... I hope to come back and write ideas... as I love marketplace thinkings... exchange, transactions, value creation, value sharing... sustainability, "growing" as a verb...


語言