Life scalability

The paradox of the economy means that a large portion of society shall be poor as they won't provide more benefits than they cost. The capitalist system means that you need to provide a lot of value added benefit to lots of individuals to profit. In other words there is a scalability problem to providing for yourself

YAML 問題

The economy creates strange states that should not be acceptable such as being not capable of affording to travel to work or stay in a place near work. From my perspective these are socially not acceptable.

Someone needs to provide enough value to be paid and to pay all their costs.

These people cannot afford all their costs.

How do we invert the life scalability problem?


沒有子分類。

投票 (可選) (別通知) (可選)
請,登錄

對了,說到點子上了。資本主義社會似乎是有意成爲達爾文主義的,充當過濾器,讓部分人口在經濟上死亡,進入那些低於能夠抓住(或支付成本)機會門檻的“奇怪”國家。如果我們能找到一種方法讓每個人都成功地發揮他們的高(如果不是全部)潛力,那就沒問題了。然而,如果這種潛力具有相同的方向,人們將面臨競爭:每個人都擴大提供與其他人支付的相同產品或服務的規模,這將導致該產品或服務的生產過剩,降低其價格,並且只讓最好的供應商提供服務。它生存下來。

動物有機體是一個非資本主義系統,它實際上爲它的所有細胞(即個體)提供持續的血液供應,這就像 UBI——普遍基本收入——應該防止這些“奇怪”的狀態。將 UBI 視爲一種來自人類的通用紅利,可以通過稅收來實現,我們當然應該防止那些“奇怪”的狀態發生。每次我們讓人們在經濟上死去,我們不只是達爾文主義地拋棄了一部分人口,我們拋棄了社會潛力和多樣性的一部分,它們在其他情況下會蓬勃發展,就像不同的物種在不同的情況下會繁榮一樣。有些人不想工作正是因爲社會制度不正確,而不是因爲他們天生就有缺陷:他們需要一個不同的社會制度。

Right, to the point. Capitalist society seem to be intentionally made to be Darwinist, to work as a filter that lets part of the population die economically, entering those "strange" states below the threshold of being able to take (or pay for the cost of) opportunities. It would be okay, if we would find a way to let everyone succeed at reaching their high (if not full) potential. Yet, if this potential shares the same direction, people will face competition: everyone scaled up providing the same product or service that other people pay for would result in overproduction of that product or service, dropping its price, and letting only the best providers of it survive.

An animal organism is a non-capitalist system, that actually provides all of its cells (i.e., individuals) with constant supply of blood, which is like UBI -- universal basic income -- that's ought to prevent these "strange" states. Think of UBI as a kind of generic dividends from humanity, could be done through taxation, we certainly should prevent those "strange" states from occurring. Every time we let people die economically, we are not just Darwinistically discarding part of the population, -- we are discarding part of the social potential and diversity, that, under other circumstances would flourish, like different species flourish under different circumstances. There are people won't want to work exactly because the social system is not right, not because they are inherently flawed: they need a different social system.



    : transiency
    :  -- 
    :  -- 
    

Mindey,

語言