Nature friendly cities

Why are buildings so anti nature ?

YAML 問題

Our buildings should provide facilities for birds and animals that have been displaced by clearings.


沒有子分類。


投票 (可選) (別通知) (可選)
請,登錄

的確,城市是爲人類建造的,而不是爲動物建造的——這真是一種恥辱。

Indeed, cities had been built for humans, but not animals -- what a disgrace.



    :  -- 
    : Ruta
    :  -- 
    

Mindey,
[+]

讓動物和鳥類靠近我們的家是一個美好的想法。例如,和兩隻小狗一起生活教會了我如此隨意的快樂和俏皮。我很好奇,如果我們與動物(和植物)住得更近,我們會變得更有同情心、更有彈性等等。

我想知道,我們是在想象這裏重新設計的城市還是重新設計的建築物?

想知道哪些動物會喜歡隔壁的產業?食物網和遷徙路線呢?

Having animals and birds close to our homes is a beautiful thought. For example, living with two dog puppies teaches me such a casual joy and playfulness. I'm curious how much more empathic, resilient etc we would become if we live closer to animals (and plants).

I wonder, are we imagining Cities Redesigned or Buildings Redesigned here?

Wondering, which animals would enjoy some industry next door? What about food webs and migration trails?


語言