The type of orgs involved in that Ecosystem can be non-profit, environmental, social awareness, among others for planetary systems wellbweing.
How can we spark a Ecosystem of organizations?
Symbiotic Creativity as The Way
A comment about the importance of interaction within a system
Our friend Struppi explains the basics of why Tetrahedron is a basic structure for systems that can easily expand into larger stable structures
Non profits are fine, but how the org is organized should not be constrained. However, the org structure is on public display, with all kinds of measurables, gauges available, for just looking. So, if it builds bombs, itll be well known. Then, there are paid sensors that check the quality and trueness of those gauges, and fundamentals used in org construction. Those are open source code, simple functions. Id like to call them poets, not sensors. They check for functionality matching names. Then, an org can be judged by auto generated descriptions.
And by "organizations", you mean "public benefit organizations"? The concept of organization in sociology is quite wide, and it includes from families to countries, and everything in between and beyond (any set of communicating interacting and collaborating agents).
A die-hard capitalist would tell you, that the capitalism is about an ecosystem of organizations, and be correct about it. So, I think it merits to be more specific about title, and more specific about what kind of ecosystem would that be.
My guess is that you're probably about mutually supportive and mutually aware non-profits and public benefit organizations, but, as said in the first paragraph "organization" has a broad definition.
澄清一下，我在談論社區模塊生態系統，nfts，形成自己的經濟系統。組織是通過組合生態系統中的其他類型的組織來構建的。它從非常基本的構建塊開始，即基礎。它的願景。但隨着我們構建它，它變得越來越清晰。完成並測試後，我將推出邏輯引擎。那就是組合的核心，邏輯系統，或者分類系統。然而你更喜歡。將會有一個低代碼開發系統。任何人都可以創建自定義 dao。而且，它應該與區塊鏈無關，任何 bc 都可以。需要社區努力來創建驅動程序，但是生態系統 csn 會分佈在許多 bc 實現中
To clarify, im talking about an ecosystem of community modules, nfts, forming an economic system of its own. Orgs are constructed by composing other types of orgs in the ecosystem. It starts with very basic building blocks, the fundamentals. Its a vision. But its getting more clear as we are building it. Ill roll out the logic engine when its finished and tested. Thats the core of composition, the logic system, or classification system. However you prefer. There will be a low code development system. Anyone can whip out a custom dao. And, it should be blockchain agnostic, any bc will do. Itll take community effort to create drivers, but then ecosystem csn be spread over a number of bc implementations
對於任何一羣人來說，經常聚會最重要的是 - 空間（他們在哪裏見面）和遊戲（他們一起做什麼）。
For any group of people to gather often what matters is - space (where do they meet) and games (what do they do together).
Any org, a country or a local club. I leave it to folks to create what they need, but the seed types will be geared towards structure with lots of degrees of freedom, fluid, open, lots of checks and balances. Then, these qualities will be publically observable thru public gauges, so people can chose what kind of org type to use. I think we can let it go at that, and itll self organize into structure of freedom. I envision devices and typified feedback loops that will keep communities in ballance. Too much freedom is not all that good either. The point is to keep community together, forever changing tho, keep it from freezing into a solid oppressive crystal but not too gaseous where it simply evoporates thru attrition, regulated thru wide participation, on local level, in a simple intuitive way. Not thru horrandously complex and fallable elections to some remote offices, but lical, organic, immidiate. Small continuous , democratic decision making process, spread thru each level of structure, fractal.the key is, each level and branch is self determined and self aware, self suffocient, but losely connected to neighbours. How far connections go is matter of adjustments, forming perspective.
Let me put this way. I dont know what all those labels mean. I deal with structure. Theres a specific type of structure of freedom, measurable as degrees of freedom. I can write a gauge that measires it in a quantum system, as i see it. Its structure with lots of overlap in node functionalities, allowing plasticity. How much degrees of freedom? That is dynamic, and should be measured and adjusted by community consent. All we need is to provide those tools, to measire and to adjust, gauges and dials. Few lines of code, and a few react components for community dashboard.
[skihappy] -- 據我所知，[malü] 在這裏寫了這個主題，並希望將其作爲一個社區，所以，這就是爲什麼有 o2oo.io/.malü 如果您對這樣的生態系統有什麼瞭解，也許最好提供有關它如何工作的廣泛描述？... 或者，“logicEngine”還沒有準備好嗎？
[skihappy] -- as I understand, [malü] wrote this topic here, and wants to have it as a community, and so, that's why there's o2oo.io/.malü, and meanwhile you, are talking on this thread about it as if the ecosystem were to be your idea, and you've got plans for it. Is there a backstory of this thread? Are you collaborating with [malü] on something? :) If you've got a picture of what such ecosystem would be, perhaps it would be good to provide an extensive descrition of how it would work?... or, is the "logicEngine" not yet ready for that?
Thats why we need land, to build our culture. I see actively spreading accumulated upside, wealth to budding communities, where an established community gets vested into a developing community, spreading the risk. The developing relationships and trust will translate to rate of currency exchange
Exactly, its not ready. This is a vision im passing. Iv been thinking about it for a while. Some aspects of it are being implemented. But, i hope others will pick it up and we can develop implementation together. I dont wanna come off as the driving force. But i wanna share my thoughts. Thats all. Im slowly working my way in that direction.
The thred was started as a question. Thats my thoughts on the subject. Im very flexible. Dont mean to hug the show, but the subject really resonates with my work. Im giving a preview. I only can hope itll be something of use. Itll take lots of people to bring it to full potential, prbly people smarter then me.
: Mindey, Ruta
經過測試後，很快就會有 api 文檔。但它的力量將隨着屏幕、用戶界面的發展而實現。我喜歡其他人在這方面進行合作
Ill have api docs soon, after its tested. But its power will be realized with development of screens, user interface. Id love for others to collaborate on that
: Mindey, Ruta
希望它成爲kostya 項目solarea 的一部分。因此，基礎設施已經部分存在。也許，我應該開始我自己的線程。簡直無法抗拒。當有更多要展示的時候，我會寫一篇文章。
Itll, hopefully, be part of kostya project, solarea. So, infrastructure already partially there. Perhaps, i shouldv started my own thread on it. Just could not resist. I will def do a write up when theres more to show.
// 我喜歡其他人在這方面進行合作 //
[jspoet]，非常期待您的 API 文檔和概念描述，當您談論您的項目時，很高興就您的項目主題進行討論。 ;) 而不是一般的“組織生態系統”主題。但是，很高興您分享了您希望組織生態系統採用的通用方向。
// Id love for others to collaborate on that //
[jspoet], definitely looking forward to your API docs, and the description of the concept, as you're talking about your project, it would be nice to have that discussion on the topic about your project. ;) rather than generic "Ecosystem of Organizations" topic. However, it's great that you're sharing the generic directions you'd like ecosystems of organizations to go to.
What can we learn from non-linear networks and ecology when we design ecosystems of organisations?
[jspoet] 分享您的項目更新永遠不會太早。我在 o2oo.io 上的大多數項目中分享了我的早期草稿 - 因爲我根據反饋進行迭代 :) 希望儘快看到您的項目更新！
實際上，通過在我們的項目中共享中間結果 - 這就是我們啓動生態系統的方式！當我們的項目遇到挑戰時 - 我們所有人都可以共同應對。
所以對於“組織的生態系統”這個問題，我要補充 - 一個生態系統需要促進成員（遊戲）之間的互動。
[jspoet] it's never too early to share your project updates. I share my early drafts in most of my projects here on o2oo.io - because I iterate based on feedback :) hope to see your project updates soon!
and actually, by sharing intermediary results in our projects - that's how we start an ecosystem! when our projects have challenges - all of us together can tackle them.
so to this question of "Ecosystem of Organisations" I'd add - an ecosystem needs to facilitate interaction between members (games).
會做。我真的很期待有一些切實的東西可以展示。 Iv 一開始就問這些問題。它真的擊中了家。這些討論非常有價值。我很實用，不過。我想構建解決方案，定義一些可衡量的、可交付的、可行的。
Will do. Im really looking forward having something tangeable to show. Iv started by asking exactly these questions. It really hits home. These discussions are extremely valuable. Im very practical, tho. I wanna build the solutions, define something measurable, deliverable, doable.
This puzzle relates to Application of Fractals in Society , Prototyping Systems and Templating Micro Communities, the main point of which is - interactions between members create a (eco)system.
Here I wonder if a minimum number of ecosystem members matters? We can drive inspiration from tetrahedrons and how they construct with one another into larger stable structures.