# "*": "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/wefindx/schema/master/intent/oo-item.yaml" # "base:title": "0oo - SolarPunk Future" "og:title": "SolarPunk Future" "og:description": "Solarpunk is a science fiction genre about positive dream futures vs the end of the world. Storytelling evokes emotion and thus motivates behaviour towards that future. So, creating positive stories is important, it helps to bring those imaginary futures into a reality. I wonder, how to imagine the futures in detail now?" "og:image": "https://avatars0.githubusercontent.com/u/28134655" "og:url": "/intent/99001/" "base:css": "/static/css/bootstrap.min.9c25540d6272.css" "base:extra-css": "/static/css/base.57997aeac1df.css" "base:favicon": "/static/favicon.acaa334f0136.ico" "base:body_class": "" "layout:logo": "/static/0oo.8d2a8bbef612.svg" "layout:index": "/" "layout:menu": "/menu/" "layout:categories": "/intents/" "layout:ideas": "/methods/" "layout:projects": "/projects/" "layout:users": "/users/" "layout:about": "/about/" "layout:help": "/help/" "layout:bug_report": "https://github.com/wefindx/0oo" "layout:login": "/accounts/login/" "layout:light-off": "/darken/?darken=true" "layout:set-multilingual": "/mulang/?mulang=true" "layout:lang": "语言" "layout:set-language-post-action": "/i18n/setlang/" "layout:csrf-token": "9tDdHsXrJKkWcIbctY05B5ZgdmUxu1v7bP4we9I8cwPSINAt2Q9n0zsRK3VOGU8i" "layout:input-next": "/intent/99001/" "layout:languages": [{"code": "ja", "is-active": "false", "name": "日本語"}, {"code": "lt", "is-active": "false", "name": "Lietuviškai"}, {"code": "zh-hans", "is-active": "true", "name": "简体中文"}, {"code": "en", "is-active": "false", "name": "English"}, {"code": "ru", "is-active": "false", "name": "Русский"}, {"code": "oo", "is-active": "false", "name": "O;o,"}] # "item:parent:intents": [{"title": "艺术", "url": "/intent/51001/"}] "item:title": "SolarPunk Future" "item:votes": +1 "item:add-vote": "#addnote" "item:intent": "/intent/99001/?l=cn" "item:base-administration": false "item:body": | Solarpunk is a science fiction genre about positive dream futures vs the end of the world. Storytelling evokes emotion and thus motivates behaviour towards that future. So, creating positive stories is important, it helps to bring those imaginary futures into a reality. I wonder, how to imagine the futures in detail now? "item:permalink": "/intent/99001/?l=cn" "item:source-date": "" "item:owner": "Ruta" "item:ownerlink": "/user/170/Ruta" "item:created": "2021-09-28T11:46:55.844122" "item:intent:child:add": "/admin/hlog/intent/add/?parent=99001" # "item:method:items": "item:method:add": "/admin/hlog/method/add/?parent=99001" "item:comment:add": "/intents/addnote?parent=99001" "item:comment:add:csrf_token": "9tDdHsXrJKkWcIbctY05B5ZgdmUxu1v7bP4we9I8cwPSINAt2Q9n0zsRK3VOGU8i" "item:comment:form": |
  • 标记评论提出新问题。
  • 标记评论有潜在解决方案。
  • 标记评论有助于推理的事实。
  • 请,登录 # "item:comment:items": - "id": "r-204001" "mtrans": | 昨天我有一个有趣的想法,我自己也不明白:“如果时间是一个循环,如果我们现在知道宇宙的语言,我们现在就可以和未来交谈!”所以这是开始探索 Solarpunk 的创意提示😀 "text": | Yesterday I had an entertaining thought which I don't understand myself: "if time is a looping circle, and if we know the language of the universe now, we can talk to future now!" So this is a creative prompt to start exploring solarpunk 😀 "owner": "Ruta" "ownerlink": "/user/170/Ruta" "permalink": "/intent/99001/?l=cn#r-204001" "created": "2021-09-28T11:50:20.812268" "vote": "" - "id": "r-205001" "mtrans": | // 我有一个有趣的想法,我自己也不明白:“..我们现在可以和未来谈谈了!” // 的确。像亚里士多德、柏拉图、德谟克利特等古人也许没有想到他们正在写他们的作品供未来数千年的人阅读——他们可能认为他们正在为当代或下一代写实用的东西或下一代的教育,无意将其作为对遥远未来的信息,就像当今大多数人不认为在线写作是为未来写作的一种形式。然而,经久不衰的网络项目让我们意识到事实就是如此。 我曾经遇到过[KEO(时间胶囊)项目](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KEO),它鼓励我写信给未来,这是我的尝试:[KEO-message.txt] (https://gist.githubusercontent.com/mindey/4842697b80219c392872c62c923593e6/raw/da7a5788c7ac47dd0621ec743d5d5814444769d2/KEO-message.txt 15 年前)。 "text": | // I had an entertaining thought which I don't understand myself: "..we can talk to future now!" // Indeed. The ancients like Aristotle, Plato, Democritus, etc. perhaps did not imagine that they are writing their works for someone to read thousands of years into the future -- they probably were thinking that they are writing practical things for the current or next generation or education of the next generation, without the intent of it to be messages to the distant future, just like most people these days do not think of writing on-line as a form of writing for the future. However, the long-lasting web projects make us realize that this is the case. I have once came around the [KEO (time capsule)project](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KEO), that encouraged me to write to the future, here's my attempt: [KEO-message.txt](https://gist.githubusercontent.com/mindey/4842697b80219c392872c62c923593e6/raw/da7a5788c7ac47dd0621ec743d5d5814444769d2/KEO-message.txt) (written more than 15 years ago). "owner": "Mindey" "ownerlink": "/user/147/Mindey" "permalink": "/intent/99001/?l=cn#r-205001" "created": "2021-09-28T12:23:01.964921" "vote": "" - "id": "r-206001" "mtrans": | Mindey 小心将破坏或破坏与坏联系起来。 没有坏的行为,只有善恶的知识。 消化食物是进行分解代谢的化学反应,将较大的形式分解成较小的形式。消化的行为并不邪恶,但它涉及形式的破坏。 烧煤不是邪恶的,但它会导致被认为是坏的事情。 意图也不足以说某事是邪恶的。 例如,如果可以阻止更多人死亡,那么杀死某人可能是件好事。杀戮本身并不邪恶。 根据您的观点,杀死他人以窃取他们的东西是邪恶的。我对法国大革命期间的杀戮没有问题,例如,饿死人民的贵族政府被杀。但是吸毒者为了买毒品而杀人可能是邪恶的。 残忍地对待动物是邪恶的。但是为了食物而杀死动物并不那么邪恶。 行动和意图不足以决定某事是否邪恶。它需要了解每个变量才能确定它是否是邪恶的。 如果有人持刀杀人,我们必须知道他们为什么持刀杀人。杀戮的意图不足以将其指定为邪恶。 "text": | Mindey be careful to associate destruction or destroy with bad. There is no bad action there is only the knowledge of good and evil. To digest food is to undergo catabolic chemical reactions to break down larger forms into smaller forms. The act of digestion is not evil but it involves destruction of forms. Burning coal is not evil but it causes things that are considered bad. Intent is not enough to say something is evil either. Killing someone can be good if it stops more people from dying for example. The killing itself is not evil. Killing others to steal their things is evil depending on your perspective. I have no problem with the killing during the French Revolution for example where the aristocratic government that starved the people were killed. But a drug addict killing someone to buy drugs would probably be evil. Treating animals cruelly is evil. But killing animals for food is less evil. The action and intent is not enough to decide if something is evil. It requires knowledge of every variable to decide if it is evil. If someone is wielding a knife to kill somebody we have to know why they are wielding the knife to kill somebody. The intent to kill is not enough to designate it evil. "owner": "chronological" "ownerlink": "/user/198/chronological" "permalink": "/intent/99001/?l=cn#r-206001" "created": "2021-09-28T12:34:57.630698" "vote": "" - "id": "r-207001" "mtrans": | [时间顺序] 你能澄清你的观点吗?您的评论与“SolarPunk Future”(在讲故事中详细想象未来)的研究难题有何关联? "text": | [chronological] can you clarify your point? how does your comment relate to this research puzzle of "SolarPunk Future" (Imagining Futures in Detail in Storytelling)? "owner": "Ruta" "ownerlink": "/user/170/Ruta" "permalink": "/intent/99001/?l=cn#r-207001" "created": "2021-09-28T12:39:13.074440" "vote": "" - "id": "r-208001" "mtrans": | 澄清: 我打算用这个谜题来研究和发现富有想象力的讲故事的方法,然后用这些讲故事的方法来创造太阳能朋克艺术。所有评论者——在发帖之前,你能不能想一想——我的评论是否有助于这个谜题得出结论? 谢谢! "text": | Clarification: I intend to use this puzzle to research and discover methods for imaginative storytelling and then use these storytelling methods to create solarpunk art. All commenters - before posting, could you please think - does my comment help this puzzle reach a conclusion? Thank you! "owner": "Ruta" "ownerlink": "/user/170/Ruta" "permalink": "/intent/99001/?l=cn#r-208001" "created": "2021-09-28T12:45:04.521484" "vote": "" - "id": "r-209001" "mtrans": | // 小心将破坏或破坏与坏联系起来。 // 有一个非破坏性破坏的概念。 “非破坏性”消化的例子是工厂——例如,使用木材是因为木材是什么并且可以为我们做,因为它的高品质,而不是因为它的低品质(比如碳含量)。仅仅因为其碳含量而“消化”木材是一种“破坏性”破坏形式,破坏了木材的本质,无视树木为生长而做出的努力。 “非破坏性”破坏将是使用木材的本来面目,突出其所创造的本质,而不是将其用于信息含量低的物质...... 相同的例子推广到其他领域,例如“非破坏性”消化将是协同利用摄入的食物的高水平消化,而不是将其破坏成非常低水平的无信息成分...... 我认为将“本质的非破坏性”等同于“善”而不是恶是合理的...... "text": | // be careful to associate destruction or destroy with bad. // There's a concept of non-destructive destruction. The example in of "non-destructive" digestion would be factories -- that, for example, use the wood because of what wood is and can do for us due to its high level qualities, rather than because of its low level qualities (like carbon content). "Digesting" wood merely for its carbon content is a form of "destructive" destruction, destroying the essence of what wood is, disregarding the tree's efforts to grow that what it is. The "non-destructive" destruction would be the use of wood for what it is, highlighting its essence in what is being created from it, rather than using it for low-information-content substance... Same example generalizes to other areas, for example a "non-destructive" digestion would be the one that synergistically utilizes the ingested food for what it is at high level, rather than destroying it into very low-level un-informative constituents... I think equating "non-destructionism of essence" with "good" rathe than evil is reasonable... "owner": "Mindey" "ownerlink": "/user/147/Mindey" "permalink": "/intent/99001/?l=cn#r-209001" "created": "2021-09-28T12:55:41.486904" "vote": "" - "id": "r-210001" "mtrans": | 为了回答这个话题而不是 Mindeys 时间胶囊文本文档,抱歉 Ruta 离题了。 我经常想知道为什么我们所有的故事叙述——科幻小说、电子游戏、电影都如此反乌托邦而不是乌托邦。 我想看关于与我们不同的社会的乌托邦电影。那是完美的天堂。 "text": | To answer the topic and not Mindeys time capsule text document, sorry Ruta for that digression. I have often wondered why all our storytelling narratives - science fiction, video games, films are so dystopian rsfher than utopian. I want to see utopian films about societies that are different to ours. That are perfect like heaven. "owner": "chronological" "ownerlink": "/user/198/chronological" "permalink": "/intent/99001/?l=cn#r-210001" "created": "2021-09-28T13:40:15.555719" "vote": "" - "id": "r-211001" "mtrans": | 我认为包豪斯是将意图转化为教学法、实践、设计、人工制品和建筑的未来主义者。他们将意图转化为现代世界。现在我们生活在一个后现代世界,我们正在思考我们设计中的错误和错误,并迭代这些设计,逐步改变我们现代生活的生活方式。我们塑造我们的工具,然后我们的工具塑造我们。 以宣言的形式写给未来的信: “那就让我们创建一个新的工匠公会,没有在工匠和艺术家之间架起傲慢的阶级界限!让我们一起渴望、构想和创造未来的新结构,它将建筑、雕塑和绘画融为一体,有朝一日从百万工人的手中升起,就像新信仰的水晶符号一样。” — 沃尔特·格罗皮乌斯 "text": | I think of the Bauhaus as the futurists who turned intention into pedagogy, practices, designs, artifacts, and architecture. They turned intention into the modern world. Now that we live in a postmodern world, we are thinking through the errors and mistakes in our designs and iterating on those designs with incremental changes to the way we live modern life. We shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us. A letter to the future in the form of a manifesto: “Let us then create a new guild of craftsmen without the class distinctions that raise an arrogant barrier between craftsman and artist! Together let us desire, conceive, and create the new structure of the future, which will embrace architecture and sculpture and painting in one unity and which will one day rise toward heaven from the hands of a million workers like the crystal symbol of a new faith.” — Walter Gropius "owner": "bauhouse" "ownerlink": "/user/238/bauhouse" "permalink": "/intent/99001/?l=cn#r-211001" "created": "2021-09-28T16:06:08.844268" "vote": "[+]" - "id": "r-213001" "mtrans": | 思考,如果 Future 只是 Now 的延伸,我们可能会有相同的需求,但解决方案会有所不同。所以想象未来就是观察现在。我们有什么需求——我们的环境中有哪些元素——比如住房、交通、工作、教育等?那么,这些元素在未来会是什么样子呢?可能它们将由不同的成分组成:具有不同的特征并基于不同的价值观进行开发。说,住房可能不会是一个方形的盒子,而是更多的关于亲生物的设计,或者相反——别的东西。如何在这里包含多样性?这些值可能是什么?一个调色板!有些将是有机的、生态的、综合的;一些 - 较深的色调。 所以想象力是关于增强的。 此外,对我来说,探索从现在到未来的过渡阶段似乎很有趣。所有现有的建筑物、事物、东西会去哪里?当前的材料/事物将如何堆肥,转化为未来的物品?此外,我们人类的身份将如何转变为对未来的看法? "text": | thinking, if Future is just an extension of Now, we probably will have the same Needs, but Solutions will be different. So to imagine the future is about observing now. What needs do we have - what elements are in our environment - like housing, transportation, work, education, etc.? Then, what would these elements look like in the future? Probably they will be made of different ingredients: have different features and be developed on a different set of values. Say, housing likely won't be a square box, but be more about biophilic design or in contrary - something else. How to include diversity here? What could these values be? A palette! Some will be organic, ecologic, integrative; some - darker shades. So imagination is about augmentation. Also, to me it seems that exploring a transitional phase from Now to Future is interesting. Where would all current buildings, things, stuff go? How would current materials/things be composted, transformed into future objects? Also, how our human identitied would transform into perceptions of the future? "owner": "Ruta" "ownerlink": "/user/170/Ruta" "permalink": "/intent/99001/?l=cn#r-213001" "created": "2021-10-05T08:27:34.176187" "vote": "" - "id": "r-214001" "mtrans": | 未来实际上并不存在,而是在现在的每一个决定或想法之后刷新并发生。我们生活在一个因果宇宙中——宇宙中的每一次变化都会对下一个状态产生影响。因此,您可以通过了解每个粒子做出的所有有意识的决定来运行宇宙直至完成。你的咖啡杯是有意识的。 “现在”像节奏一样反复刷新。每个其他存在都可以做出决定以对您的决定做出反应。所以过去现在和未来同时发生,一起发生。就像一个事件。这就是永恒存在于每一秒之间的方式。对宇宙的每一次影响都会创建一个单独的时间线,该时间线符合该决定。那是你的记忆。每一个你都是真实的自己。我认为遭受痛苦或有痛苦的人将其融入他们的生活,以服务于一些更伟大的经历或目的。上帝是好的,他不会无缘无故地让我们受苦。我们甚至可能给自己带来痛苦。我真的相信每个人都能得到他们想要的东西,并相信这是真的。换句话说,每个人都会得到他们的想法和决定的后果。 这就是上帝如何向你展示你的[自己的葬礼](https://www.iands.org/research/nde-research/nde-archives31/newest-accounts/1515-following-motorcycle-accident-man-has-vision -of-his-own-funeral.html)当您决定是留在世界上完成您的使命还是死在世界上并在这里完成您的精神成长使命时,这是一种濒临死亡的体验。 这就是为什么想象未来并定义我们想要的对于获得我们想要的东西如此重要。我们需要把我们想要给宇宙的东西形象化,这样宇宙才能给我们。 你想象或想到的是一个本体。它是一个真实的物体,可以在灵性层面进行交互和感知。 我希望上班不需要旅行。我的住处应该离我工作的地方有 5-10 分钟的路程。所以这意味着密集的生活安排。 我希望将计算机计算用于对社会有益的目的,这就是我为普通人创建计算类别的原因。我希望桌面计算、自托管和网络的复兴变得更好。我希望组织为个人进行管理和必要的工作 - 组织家庭事务和提供食品配送。人们不必浪费时间购买必需品。有人需要组织从有机农场到人们住宅或公共厨房的食品运输。 我小时候有一个梦想,岛上有一个同心圆的地下铁路系统。这个想法是你可以轻松地绕圈旅行。我从来没有解决过比横向绕更中心的问题。你的生活就像在一个特定的戒指中。 我们需要更容易获得的无残忍食物,所以无肉,更多的素食食谱/菜肴。每只鸡和牛都是一个充满爱心的人。 想象一个酒店和住房免费的世界,你可以住在你想要的地方。 "text": | Future doesn't actually exist but is refreshed and happens after every decision or thought in the now. We live in a cause and effect universe - every change in the universe gives the effect for the next state. So you can run the universe to completion by knowing all the conscious decisions each particle makes. Your coffee mug is conscious. "Now" is refreshed repeatedly like a rhythm. Every other being gets to make a decision to react to your decision. So past present and future happen all at once, together. Like one event. This is how eternity exists between each second. Every effect on the universe creates a separate timeline that is true to that decision. That's your memory. Every you is true to yourself. I think people who suffer or have pain have it incorporated into their lives to serve some greater experience or purpose. God is good he doesn't make us suffer for no reason. We might even cause the suffering to ourselves. I truly believe everybody gets what they want and believe to be true. In other words, everybody gets the consequences of their thoughts and decisions. This is how God can show you your [own funeral](https://www.iands.org/research/nde-research/nde-archives31/newest-accounts/1515-following-motorcycle-accident-man-has-vision-of-his-own-funeral.html) a near death experience when you get to decide whether to stay in the world and fulfil your mission or die in the world and complete your mission here for spiritual growth. This is why imagining the future and defining what we want is so important to getting what we want. We need to visualize what we want to the universe so that the universe gives it to us. What you imagine or think is a noumenon. It's a real object that can be interacted with and perceived in the spiritual plane. I want travel to be unnecessary to get to work. My living quarters should be 5-10 minutes away from my work place. So this implies a dense living arrangement. I want computer computation to be used for socially beneficial purposes that's why I created the category for computation for normal people. I want a resurgence of desktop computing, self hosting and the web to get better. I want organisations doing administration and necessary work for individuals - organising things of the home and supplying food deliveries. People don't have to waste their time shopping for essentials. Someone needs to organise food transport from organic farms to people's houses or communal kitchens. I had a dream as a child of an island with an underground railway system which was concentric circles. The idea being you could travel around the circle easily. I never did solve the problem of going more central than going around laterally. You live your life as if in a particular ring. We need more readily available cruelty free food so meat free, more vegetarian recipes/dishes. Each chicken and cow is a loving being. Imagine a world where hotels and housing is free and you can live where you want. "owner": "chronological" "ownerlink": "/user/198/chronological" "permalink": "/intent/99001/?l=cn#r-214001" "created": "2021-10-08T13:55:10.328817" "vote": "" "base:js": "/static/js/base.c7357c06cc89.js"