概念: The Scandal of Money

The Time Shop

+2  

Exchange products based on the amount of time it takes to produce them

YAML 想法



(別通知) (可選) 請,登錄

呵呵,這與消費者價格細分要求的想法有關。擁有一臺可以生產數百萬質量相同的物品的機器的人去同一個市場與手工製品競爭,而人們在不瞭解人工估算的情況下購買它們,這可能是不公平的。如果將這種人工估算值包含在標籤中,例如成分(通常在法律上要求包含成分),那麼人們將開始意識到並調整某些社會不平等現象,例如產品定價。

Heh, that is so related to the idea of consumer price breakdown requirement. It may be unfair that someone with a machine who can produce millions of items of same quality goes to the same market to compete with handmade items, and people buying them without knowing the human-time estimate. If this human-time estimate were to be included into labels, like an ingredient (ingredients are often legally required to be included), then people would start realizing and adjusting certain social inequalities, like product pricing.



    : transiency
    :  -- 
    :  -- 
    

Mindey,

它也與0oo有關嗎? [敏迪]

Does it relate to 0oo too? [Mindey]


呵呵,從我們以“人類工時”衡量[(/ rate /)價值的意義上講,確實是,將“花費的時間”作爲我們社區的KPI(here )。但是,交易不是在“米”之間發生,而是在實際對象和“繩”之間發生,從這個意義上說,“米”是中性的,因此我們不會在“度量單位”中進行0oo的交換。我們以實際貨幣來表示,但是我們以所有貨幣的“ h”(米)來表示和顯示。因此,我想,您可以說“是與否”。

Heh, well, it does, in the sense that we measure value in "human hours", targeting for "time-well spent" as our community's KPI (here). However, trade happens not between "meters", but between actual objects and "ropes", in that sense, the "meter" is a bit of a neutral thing, so we don't do exchange on 0oo in "unit of measure" we do it in real currencies, but we express and display it in "h" (the meter" of all currencies. So, I'd say, you could say both "yes and no".



    : Ruta
    :  -- 
    :  -- 
    

Mindey,

語言