Exchange products based on the amount of time it takes to produce them
Heh, that is so related to the idea of consumer price breakdown requirement. It may be unfair that someone with a machine who can produce millions of items of same quality goes to the same market to compete with handmade items, and people buying them without knowing the human-time estimate. If this human-time estimate were to be included into labels, like an ingredient (ingredients are often legally required to be included), then people would start realizing and adjusting certain social inequalities, like product pricing.
Does it relate to 0oo too? [Mindey]
呵呵，從我們以“人類工時”衡量[（/ rate /）價值的意義上講，確實是，將“花費的時間”作爲我們社區的KPI（here ）。但是，交易不是在“米”之間發生，而是在實際對象和“繩”之間發生，從這個意義上說，“米”是中性的，因此我們不會在“度量單位”中進行0oo的交換。我們以實際貨幣來表示，但是我們以所有貨幣的“ h”（米）來表示和顯示。因此，我想，您可以說“是與否”。
Heh, well, it does, in the sense that we measure value in "human hours", targeting for "time-well spent" as our community's KPI (here). However, trade happens not between "meters", but between actual objects and "ropes", in that sense, the "meter" is a bit of a neutral thing, so we don't do exchange on 0oo in "unit of measure" we do it in real currencies, but we express and display it in "h" (the meter" of all currencies. So, I'd say, you could say both "yes and no".