Money valuation as a continuous wave function like the stock market

0  

Imagine being capable of affording something really expensive one minute but not the next? This is how dynamic production could be

YAML 想法

Your money can be worth a different amount of money over time, based on your contributions to society.

If you do 8 hours of work, your money should suddenly be worth more.

If you accept a lot of free things and do no work, your money should be worth less.



(別通知) (可選) 請,登錄

你沒有具體說明這將如何工作......那麼如何?

You didn't specify the how this would work exactly... So how?


在愛爾蘭有一種叫做股票市場的酒吧,菜單項目的價格顯示在電視顯示屏上,價格會隨着時間的推移在夜間發生變化。如果你等待它,你可以便宜地得到飲料或食物。

有一些算法使股市酒吧對訪問者很有趣。

現在,社會是由很多人組成的,每個人每一秒都在貢獻着不同的東西。

一些人(消費者)貢獻了對產品的需求:水、電、食品,它們爲他人創造了工作。這是一件好事。我們需要將該需求表示爲波函數的一部分。所以我們需要某種方式來檢測事物的需求,數字會計系統可以解決這個問題。例如智能手機上帶有按鈕的應用程序。或數字 NFC 鍵控商店和工作場所。

每個人都在看電視時,沒有做任何工作,打開水壺時,用電量上升。

我認爲有些人比其他人爲更好的社會做出了貢獻。我認爲快遞員、廚師、超市物流等基本工人是文明文明的重要人物。它們允許社會的其他部分發揮作用。不幸的是,這些職位沒有聲望,也沒有得到絕大多數社會的尊重。不幸的是,受過教育的人不願意做這些工作,因爲經濟激勵意味着他們可以在其他地方得到更多。

擁有財富的人比每天被迫勞動的人更懶惰,他們在經濟上創造了更多的財富,但他們在世界上做的實際工作也更少。在一個地區養活 1000 人比創造數十億美元的收入更爲重要。

我不想強迫每個人都高效,這與我的目標背道而馳。

我希望那些做最多工作的人能夠得到他們能負擔得起的回報。所以即使是一個窮人也應該得到他提供的1000個富人的產出。

波函數在工作完成時產生較高的數值,而在沒有工作完成時產生較低的數值。

這是一個力量倍增器。需求信號真的很有價值,當你在餐廳並且對某個菜單項目有需求時,你會爲需求做更多的準備。

同樣,筆記本電腦或手機制造商生產更多需求量大的產品。需求信號本身很有價值,但沒有人爲此付費。

人們應該爲他們的需求信號付費,因爲它協調社會並協調資源的最佳使用以實現互利。

波函數被添加到你擁有的錢上,這增加了你購買的力量,並在系統中充當額外的錢。

In Ireland there's something called the stock market bar, where prices of menu items are displayed on a television display, the prices change over time over the night. You can get a drink or food cheaply if you wait for it.

There's some algorithm which causes the stock market bar to be entertaining to those who visit.

Now, society is composed of many people, and each person is contributing a different thing every second.

Some people (consumers) contribute demand for products: water, electricity, food which generates work for others. This is a good thing. We need to represent that demand as part of a wave function. So we need some way of detecting demand for things, digital accounting systems can solve this problem. Such as an app on a smartphone with a button. Or digital NFC keyed shops and workplaces.

When everyone is watching television, no work is being done and when the kettle is turned on, the use of electricity goes up.

I think some people contribute to a better society than other people. I think essential workers such as delivery drivers, chefs and supermarket logistics are very important people for civilized civilization. They allow the rest of society to function. Unfortunately there is no prestige in these positions and they are not respected by the vast majority of society. Unfortunately, educated people are not willing to do these kinds of jobs due to economic incentives mean they can get more elsewhere.

People who have wealth are lazier than people who are forced into labour everyday, economically they produce more wealth but they also do less actual work in the world. Feeding 1000 people in a local area is more fundamentally essential than generating $billions in revenues.

I don't want to force everyone to be productive, that's the opposite of my goal.

I want the people who do the most work to be rewarded by what they can afford. So even a poor person should deserve the output of 1000 rich persons he provides for.

The wave function produces a higher number when work is done and a low number when no work is being done.

This is a force multiplier. The demand signal is really valuable, when you're in a restaurant and there is a demand for a certain menu item, you cook more of that kind of item in preparation for the demand.

Likewise, a laptop or phone manufacturer produces more of the kind of item that has high demand. The demand signal itself is valuable but nobody is paid for it.

People should be paid for their demand signal, as it coordinates society and orchestrates best use of resources for mutual profitability.

The wave function is added to what money you do have, and this increases the power of your purchases and acts as additional money in the system.



    : transiency
    : Mindey
    :  -- 
    

chronological,

我的印象是金錢已經這樣運作了(例如,機票價格波動使廉價旅行有時更實惠,也有各種廉價交易機會,稱爲“拋售”等,而金錢的價值是非常有背景的和多重:例如,一個單位的貨幣值一杯咖啡和去該國另一邊的旅行,有時價格相同),但它沒有可視化,也沒有專注於讓社會階層看到機會.是不是你提議的——是一些系統來可視化它,並幫助緩解財富不平等?

My impression is that money already works like that (e.g., air ticket price fluctuation makes cheap travel more affordable at times, there are also various cheap deal opportunities, called "sell-offs", etc., and the value of money is very contextual and multiple: e.g., a single unit of currency being worth a cup of coffee AND a trip to another side of the country, sometimes at the same price), but it's not visualized, and not focused on making the opportunities apparent to segments of society. Is it that what you're proposing -- is some system to visualize that, and help alleviate the wealth inequality?


我建議直接根據那個人來評估人的錢的價值。

所以錢不僅僅是一個數字,這個數字有購買力,但有一個遞歸函數 person_x(person_y(society_valuation((f(person_z, numeric amount, person_z_demand_history, person_z_work_or_additions_to_society)))) = 購買力。

我認爲此時金錢的估值是看不見的。

I suggest that the value of people's money be directly valued based on that person.

So money isn't just a number, and that number has buying power but that there is a recursive function person_x(person_y(society_valuation((f(person_z, numerical amount, person_z_demand_history, person_z_work_or_additions_to_society)))) = buying power.

I think the valuation of money is invisible at this time.


語言