Mod-Laws of Physics

0  

Try to change the laws of physics, and verify if we are at base reality or not.

YAML 想法

I have one very observable thing - the laws of physics. If we were at base reality, arguably, the laws of physics would be part of it, as an object, which we can change. For now, we have zero evidence that someone would have changed the laws of physics. So, the idea is to run experiments to try to change the laws of physics at large. For example, change the Speed of Light, or something else that we can measure very precisely.

Of course, we can predict the consequences of changing the constants. For example, changing gravitational constant would result in change of planet orbits and densities of matter (e.g., intensification in the number of supernovas). This could be an avenue for observational evidence.

On the other hand, if it is the fact (which it seems to be) that we don't see the laws of physics as separate modifiable objects, then it arguably suggests that we are not at base reality.

Your critique is very welcome -- would it work, or why wouldn't work.



(別通知) (可選) 請,登錄

我們是否在處理 3D 現實中的物理定律? 還是 2D 或 4D?

它們在各個維度上是如何被感知的,我們使用什麼工具來“解讀”這些規律?我猜Mind是工具對吧?

如果“心智”只遵循 3D,那麼我們就受制於這些,

但是作爲默認的“人類意識”“讀取”3D以外的其他維度,那麼人類意識是否能夠“改變”那些3D“法則”?

像“融化湯匙”?或者那是“全心”的力量,還是人類心智與“自然”心智合一的力量?哦,現在只是問題..

Are we addressing laws of physics in the 3D reality? or in 2D or 4D?

how are they perceived in each dimension, and which tool do we use to "read" these laws? I guess Mind is the tool right?

And if "mind" follows 3D only, then we are governed by these,

but as "human consciousness" as default "reads" other Dimensions than the 3D, then would human consciousness be able to "change" those 3D "laws"?

like "melting th spoon"? or is that the power of "full mind" or the human mind in onesness with the "natural" mind? oh well just questions for now..



    :  -- 
    : Mindey
    :  -- 
    

Bassxn2,

// 我們在處理 3D 現實中的物理定律嗎?還是 2D 或 4D?

我所說的“物理定律”是指在受控、可複製的情況下測量之間的關係。這些關係可以是確定性的或概率性的。是的,我們生活在可觀察的 3 1D 空間中,因此,在這個空間中進行測量。

// 我們使用哪個工具來“閱讀”這些法律?我猜Mind是工具對吧?

理想情況下,通過儀器和多個頭腦,而不僅僅是一個頭腦。

// 人類意識是否能夠“改變”那些 3D“法則”?

我們不知道,我們也不知道某些設備是否可以在附近或全球範圍內改變物理定律。

但是,如果某人或某物確實改變了物理定律,那麼我們怎麼知道定律的可變性不是定律之一呢?人類將開始研究法律如何改變它所依賴的任何事物,並將這種改變稱爲新法律。

// Are we addressing laws of physics in the 3D reality? or in 2D or 4D?

By "laws of physics", I mean, relationships between measurements under controlled, replicable circumstances. The relationships could be deterministic or probabilistic. Yes, we live in observable 3+1D space, so, measurements in this space.

// which tool do we use to "read" these laws? I guess Mind is the tool right?

Ideally, by instruments and multiple minds, not just a single mind.

// would human consciousness be able to "change" those 3D "laws"?

We don't know, neither do we know if some device could change the laws of physics within a vicinity, or globally.

However, if someone or something did change the laws of physics, then how would we know if the mutability of the laws isn't one of the laws? Humanity would start investigating how the law changes with respect to whatever it depends on, and call that change - a new law.


語言