A Book on the Future of Jobs with AR / VR App

0  

YAML 想法

A cartoon book that walks you through professions in technology industry which didn't existed 20 years ago (ie. digital marketer, UX designer, etc).

The goal of a book is to educate people and get them visualising the possibilities within technology industry that didn't exist a few years back.

The book aims:

  • to show what jobs are available in the technology industry.
  • to inspire people of any age to rethink what job they want to do today and tomorrow.

Why a book?

  • People still read (and share) books.
  • No matter if you have digital skills or Internet access, you can still read a book.
  • No matter what language you speak or what age you are, you can "read" images.
  • As a physical object it has a tactile element that people can relate to.


(別通知) (可選) 請,登錄

這本書可能類似於[“人們整天做什麼?” ](http://www.amazon.co.uk/What-Do-People-All-Day/dp/0007353693“ http:// www.amazon.co.uk/What-Do-People-All-Day/dp/0007353693“)由Richard Scarry撰寫。

The book could be similar to "What Do People Do All Day?" written by Richard Scarry.


魯塔,這本書如何使人們賺錢?提供選擇?在編寫[this](http://old.mindey.com/ideju_dienorastis.htm時,我曾考慮過向孩子介紹所有可能的工作的方法。

[ruta], how the book would let people make money? Provide the choices? I've thought about something along the lines of introducing kids with all possible jobs when writing this, however, I think just presenting all possible jobs is not a good way to facilitate thinking. Instead, it seems like a way to restrict thinking.

Ah.. and, the whole 'Book on Future of Jobs' - very cliché idea. A problem? Just write a book on it. Not very creative, not a solution that would present some innovative new principle.


魯塔,而且...這個想法會完全解決問題嗎?符合解決方案要求的想法應以很高的成功率徹底解決問題。我認爲,即使存在這樣的書,僅憑這本書也無法解決問題。讓我們發佈實際上可以完全解決問題的系統想法。也許這應該是我們發佈想法的規則?

[ruta], and... would this idea solve the problem completely? An idea that qualifies for solution should solve the problem completely, with high probability of success. Even if such book existed, I think, this book alone would not solve the problem. Let's post systematic ideas that would actually completely solve a problem. Maybe this should be a rule on our idea posting?


[Mindey],你是對的!我添加了一個與此問題更多相關的不同問題。

比教人們如何賺錢更重要的是教給人們批判性思維和培養動力。我們應該翻譯您在博客上談論的想法,並在此處分享。我真的很喜歡動機部分。

[Mindey], you're right! I added a different problem that relates to this idea more.

What's more important than teaching people how to make money is teaching people critical thinking and fostering motivation. We should translate an idea you talk about on your blog and share it here. I really like the motivation part.


//我添加了一個與該想法更多相關的問題。 //

魯塔,在哪裏?鏈接?

// I added a different problem that relates to this idea more. //

[ruta], where? link?


>並且...這個想法會完全解決問題嗎?符合解決方案要求的想法應以很高的成功率徹底解決問題。也許這應該是我們發佈想法的規則?

[Mindey],也許。目前尚不清楚如何描述一個想法。我們應該考慮哪些指南可以幫助用戶(包括我自己)理解。 (爲此,我們有一個[task](https://infty.xyz/task/89/detail/“ https://infty.xyz/task/89/detail/”))。

同樣,我們需要一種方法,如果某個主意不能爲問題提供解決方案,則允許任何用戶標記內容,並鼓勵主意所有者編輯問題或重寫主意。我們也有一個[task](https://infty.xyz/task/94/detail/“ https://infty.xyz/task/94/detail/”)。

儘管_solution_的含義與_idea_的含義不同。人們如何看待這兩個詞?

and... would this idea solve the problem completely? An idea that qualifies for solution should solve the problem completely, with high probability of success. Maybe this should be a rule on our idea posting?

[Mindey], Perhaps. At the moment it's not entirely clear how to describe an idea. We should think about what guidance will help users (myself included) understand. (We have a task for this).

Also, we need a way of letting any user to flag content if an idea doesn't provide a solution to a problem, and encourage an idea owner to edit a problem or rewrite an idea. We have a task for this as well.

Although, the meaning of solution is not the same as of idea. How do people see both terms?


[ruta]

>另外,我們需要一種方法,如果某個主意無法解決問題,則允許任何用戶標記內容,並鼓勵主意所有者編輯問題或重寫主意。我們也有一個任務。

是。

> _solution_的含義與_idea_的含義不同。人們如何看待這兩個詞?

是的,需要水的人想到了提桶的想法,這成爲解決方案。我們可以將一個想法定義爲一個通用解決方案,使每個人都不必再解決該問題。

[ruta]

Also, we need a way of letting any user to flag content if an idea doesn't provide a solution to a problem, and encourage an idea owner to edit a problem or rewrite an idea. We have a task for this as well.

Yes.

the meaning of solution is not the same as of idea. How do people see both terms?

Yes, people who need water come up with an idea to carry buckets, and that becomes a solution. We could define an idea as a general solution, that frees everyone from having to solve that problem ever again.


[Mindey],對於想法/解決方案階段,我不確定。

系統的“目的”是什麼?

用戶流:

人們聊天時,人們接下來可以/應該做什麼?

人們會一直聊天直到找到解決問題的最佳方法,或者,

聊天直到有人知道一個主意,然後跳入任務並嘗試實現它?

例如,我們與z進行了關於“ [使人們能夠賺更多錢](https://infty.xyz/goal/5/detail/

[Mindey], I'm not sure about something in terms of idea/solution stage.

What's the purpose of the system?

User flows:

When people chat, what people can/should do next? Do people chat until they find the perfect solution to a problem or, chat until someone gets an idea, and then jumps into tasks and tries to implement it?

For example, we had a chat with z about the problem "Enabling People to Earn More Money". We discovered that the root problem is a lack of the role models. So, I came up with an idea of a book.

If this idea stays in the comments I and everyone will forget it. I'd like to save it in some ways and try to implement it with people, and see if it makes an impact towards the problem (not necessarily solves the whole problem).


[ruta],

>人們聊天時,人們接下來可以/應該做什麼?人們會一直聊天直到找到問題的最佳解決方案,還是一直聊天直到有人知道一個主意然後跳入任務並嘗試實現它?

在問題頁面上-是的。但是,我們不應僅僅因爲它們似乎可以解決問題而發表任意的想法。發佈時,我們有一個絕妙的主意。然後,在想法頁面上,我們應該更多地討論想法本身的有效性,而不是搜索想法。

>如果這個想法留在評論中,我和每個人都會忘記它。

這裏什麼都沒有忘記。 :)也許我們可以製作[idea-here]之類的標籤來索引小創意。

[ruta],

When people chat, what people can/should do next? Do people chat until they find the perfect solution to a problem or, chat until someone gets an idea, and then jumps into tasks and tries to implement it?

On the problem page -- yes. However, we should not post arbitrary ideas, just because they remotely seem to solve the problem. Post, when we have a brilliant idea. On the idea page, we should then talk more about the validity of the idea itself rather than search for ideas.

If this idea stays in the comments I and everyone will forget it.

Nothing is forgotten here. :) Maybe we could make tags like [idea-here] for indexing little ideas.


_>也許我們可以製作[idea-here]之類的標籤來索引小創意。

_

[Mindey],好主意。

在我們從一個問題開始並通過對話的情況下,我們意識到問題不是路線問題,可以選擇單擊按鈕並創建_sub-problem_。想法也一樣。當一個問題/想法引發子問題和想法時,我們需要什麼功能來允許用戶組織它們?

當我們進行的對話不在特定頁面上時(就像我們關於功能的聊天不在主題對書本的想法之內一樣),我們是否需要功能來允許用戶將話題外的對話移至其他頁面?哪一頁?

_> Maybe we could make tags like [idea-here] for indexing little ideas. _

[Mindey], good idea.

In situations when we start with one problem and through a conversation we realise that the problem is not the route problem, it'd be nice to have an option to click a button and create a sub-problem. Same for ideas. When one problem/idea sparks sub-problems and ideas, what functionality do we need to allow users to organise them?

When we have conversations which are off-topic to a particular page (just like our chat about features is off topic to an idea of a book), do we need functionality to allow users to move off-topic conversations to a different page? Which page?


魯塔,所以您想要一個完整的分層網絡?好了,通過創建問題本身的外鍵很容易創建子問題。就像我們目前有子作品一樣。但是,這種結構會使試圖理解某些事物的創造者變得更加艱苦。理想情況下,我們希望問題解決者完成將問題分解爲子問題(例如里程碑)的工作,這些子問題對於解決問題是完全必要和充分的。這將使結構清晰併爲將來的學習者所理解。

如果未來的學習者將不得不經歷原始創作者的複雜迷宮,它將使學習者的生活更加艱難。

[ruta], so you want a full-fledged hierarchical network? Well, sub-problems are easy to create by creating a foreign key to the problem itself. Just like we currently have with sub-works. However, this kind of structure would make the person who tries to understand the creation of something -- much harder work. Ideally, we want the problem solvers to do the work of breaking down the problem into sub-problems (e.g., milestones) that are exactly necessary and sufficient to solve the problem. This will make the structure clear and understandable for future learners.

If the future learner will have to go through complex mazes of the thinking of original creator, it will make the learner's life harder...


[Mindey],好的,這很有道理!我明白你對教育價值的觀點。該平臺的目的實際上是解決問題,而不是構想。在發佈問題和想法之前,我們應該花一些時間。

[Mindey], okay, this makes sense! I see your point on the educational value. The purpose of the platform is problem solving indeed, rather than ideation. We should take time before posting problems and ideas then.


本書可能有一個具有增強現實功能的移動應用程序。類似於[this](http://toyland.gizmodo.com/disney-has-invented-3d-coloring-books-1734309000“ http://toyland.gizmodo.com/disney-has-invented-3d-coloring- books-1734309000“)。

或者,通過連接的虛擬現實應用程序,人們實際上可以“體驗”新職業。

This book could have a mobile app with Augmented Reality functionality. Similar to this.

Or, connected Virtual Reality app, where people could actually "experience" new professions.


語言