Adversarial companies
Adversarial companies are adversarial companies designed to topple international organisations funded by governments
If competition is good, then it follows that...
Big companies rarely do things efficiently or fairly, they don't compete.
We should make big companies sweat by writing a blank check for companies designed to topple other big companies to do things better than them.
+[項目]
好吧，公司，無論大小，都是政府的 工具，如果在他們那裏註冊的話。通常，大而繁榮的公司之所以成爲這樣，是因爲對管理的信任，並且代表的不是單個產品，而是被管理的多個產品和團隊，因此，它們更像是投資組合而不是公司本身。
現在，假設您想創建一家競爭對手公司。這意味着創建一個競爭的投資組合管理。
那麼，我們應該把支票寫給誰——另一個競爭的投資組合經理（因爲這是他們在財務上競爭的水平），或者你只是指產品方面的競爭？如果是產品方面的競爭，那麼爲初創公司提供資金已經對建立產生了壓力，但這通常不是對建立的金融競爭，因爲他們正在收購初創公司，使其成爲其管理組合的一部分。
Well, companies, big or small, are tools of governments, if registered with them. Usually, large and prosperous companies become such because of trust in management, and represent not a single product, but a number of products and teams being managed, so, they are more like portfolios rather than companies per se.
Now, suppose you want to create a competitor company. That means creating a competing portfolio management.
So, who should we write the check to -- another competing portfolio manager (as that's the level at which they would be financially competing), or you just mean product-wise competition? If product-wise competition, then funding startups already creates pressure to establishment, but that is not generally a financial competition to the establishment, as they are buying up startups, make them part of their management portfolios.