問題: 社會High Incomes

Essential worker stipend

+3  

Society can reward who make modern society liveable

YAML 想法

People are not reimbursed properly for their efforts. Income for regular people typically comes from a career or a job.

For this idea I will use a shelf stacker in a supermarket as my example.

Without shelf stackers, we couldn't have supermarkets as the stock would by lying in warehouses. You need someone to physically move foodstuffs and products from warehouses into trucks and lorries and ultimately to supermarkets.

This job, while menial, is essential for civilization. It should be valued. It's a contribution to society and keeps people fed.

I propose a great analysis off every possible work that needs to be done for modern society and place them into a digital system. It includes jobs like nursing and doctors. These jobs are special and essential for society. Now we want to reimburse people who do these jobs with a higher income. Government sets aside a billion pounds from general taxation to pay for these essential workers, to invest in the common folk and boost their income.

Estate agents would be excluded from this social credit as they do not contribute to society.



(別通知) (可選) 請,登錄

//政府從一般稅收中撥出10億英鎊來支付這些基本工人的錢,以投資於普通民衆並增加他們的收入。 //

就這麼簡單-Occam的剃鬚刀就放在一邊。好的,但是十億夠了嗎?在什麼時間段內?它的數學原理是什麼?

即,它的可持續性如何。此外,在稱其爲“社會信用體系”的同時,我們希望對採用這種體系的當前收入水平和預期的高收入水平做出更多解釋。

// Government sets aside a billion pounds from general taxation to pay for these essential workers, to invest in the common folk and boost their income. //

So as simple as that -- Occam's razor, just set aside. Alright, but would one billion be enough, and for what period of time? What's the math of it?

I.e., how sustainable is it. Also, while calling it "Social credit system" -- we'd expect some more explanation, of the current level of incomes and the expected high level of incomes, with such system in place.


您的意思是deus ex machina而不是occam的剃鬚刀嗎?

當我解決這個問題時,我將加起來我認爲對低薪社會至關重要的超市工作人員,護士,醫生和其他職業的數量。將那十億除以那個人數。和送貨司機。每年都會。

這是對社會必不可少的獎勵。

Do you mean deus ex machina rather than occam's razor?

When I get around to it, I'll add up the number of supermarket workers, nurses, doctors and other vocations that I consider to be essential for society that are underpaid. And divide that billion by that number of people. And delivery drivers. It would be every year.

It's a reward for being essential to society.


對。我在等數字。也許公共服務部門的統計數據可以告訴我,因爲我不確定,今天在英國假設有多少人會屬於這些類別。

Right. I'm waiting for the numbers. Perhaps public services sector statistics could tell, cause I'm not so sure, how many people would fall into these categories today, say, in the UK I presume.


也就是說,要重新評估每個人的勞動的價值?我贊成〜 重點是如何全社會達成共識。


語言